The Almanack of Naval Ravikant by Eric Jorgenson

10 of 10 stars

Here is a fun little fact about this book: I had absolutely no idea who Naval Ravikant was before I started it.

I do not even know why The Almanack of Naval Ravikant was in my Audible library. My best guess is that Naval or the book was mentioned on some podcast while discussing something else, I tossed it onto my wish list, and then at some point it went on sale and quietly migrated into my collection. There it sat until, apparently, I was ready for it.

And I think that last part matters.

I went into this expecting something closer to a business or self-help book. Naval is an entrepreneur and investor, after all, and the early sections certainly talk about wealth, leverage, specific knowledge, economics and building a career around things that cannot easily be taught or replicated.

But somewhere along the way I realized I was not really listening to a business book at all. This was philosophy wearing a Silicon Valley nametag. Naval talks about wealth, but he is really talking about freedom. He talks about retirement, but defines it not as reaching a certain age or accumulating enough money to stop working, but as the point where you stop sacrificing today for some imaginary tomorrow. He talks about passive income, but what he really values is ownership of your time. He talks about work, but one of the ideas that resonated most with me was finding something that “looks like work to others, but feels like play to me.”

That one has been rattling around in my head ever since.

So has his description of karma as essentially the repetition of our habits. We tend to think about the results we want while continuing to repeat the behaviors that created our current circumstances. There is nothing mystical required. Do the same things long enough and eventually those patterns start looking like destiny.

That one hit a little harder than I would have preferred. The book kept doing that. A sentence about money would turn into a question about time. A discussion about career would become a question about identity. A chapter on happiness would make me reconsider what success is supposed to look like in the first place.

By the time Naval moved into meditation, happiness, desire and the nature of the mind, any remaining illusion that I was reading a conventional self-improvement book was gone. It reminded me somewhat of Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance. Not because the two books are especially similar in structure or argument, but because both are Trojan horses. You pick one up because you think it is about one subject and discover that the real subject is simply: How should a person live?

That is also why I suspect this book will not work equally well for everyone. I highly recommend it, but with a caveat. You have to be willing to meet it halfway.

This is not the kind of book where I would confidently tell every person, “Read this immediately and it will change your life.” Some books are informational. If you need the information, the book works whenever you open it.

Books like this are different. Timing matters. I have talked before about my relationship with American Aquarium and wondering whether their music changed my life or whether changes in my life made their music better. Their albums seemed to arrive at exactly the right stages of my adulthood. Move those releases a few years in either direction and I might still love the band, but perhaps not with the same intensity.

I think books can work the same way. Had I read The Almanack of Naval Ravikant ten years ago, I am not sure the same passages would have mattered to me. I might have focused primarily on entrepreneurship, money and career. Reading it now, I kept stopping at ideas about time, responsibility, habits, happiness, work, legacy and what constitutes a life well lived.

Same book. Same reader, but…different reader. That makes me especially curious about rereading it.

My wife Sarah rereads Brené Brown’s Dare to Lead before every school year. I can see The Almanack becoming that kind of book for me, something I return to every few years to see which passages light up this time. Which ideas will barely register because I have moved beyond them? Which ones will suddenly make sense because life finally supplied the necessary context? Which sentence that I nodded at this time will punch me directly in the chest at 55?

That possibility is part of what makes this a 10 for me. This is also a book ideally suited for people who like to sit with a physical copy, highlighter in hand, and occasionally stop reading altogether. Read three pages. Underline a sentence. Close the book. Stare at the wall for ten minutes. Argue with yourself. Come back tomorrow.

I listened to the audiobook, but I found myself repeatedly stopping to think about passages, talk about them and write notes. In that sense, the conversations the book sparked became my margins. And that may be the highest praise I can give it.

The books that stay with me are rarely the ones that simply give me answers. They are the ones that change the questions I ask afterward. What is wealth? What is retirement? What work would I continue doing if money were irrelevant? Are my habits creating the future I claim to want? How much of happiness comes from getting what I desire, and how much comes from learning not to be controlled by desire? What does a calm mind actually require? What am I building that might outlast me?

I did not expect a collection of thoughts from an entrepreneur I had never heard of to send me down all of those roads. But here we are.

Maybe the strangest thing about The Almanack of Naval Ravikant is that I would love to recommend it to everyone while simultaneously understanding why it will not resonate with everyone. You may need to meet this book at the right moment.

I apparently did.

10 of 10 stars.

Leave a comment